|
|
Post by xneroazzurox on Jan 3, 2017 12:32:46 GMT
Got two spare copies from Coretex, MINT condition of course.
Major Wants:
REV002 - Together Comp (any press)
REV012 - GB-Start Today on purple
REV015 - Judge-BID on green
REV 25 - Chicago Presses whole set except YOT
Chain of Strength - What holds us apart on Foundation Records any press
Project X on Schism any press
Wide Awake on Schism any press
Of course most of these won't match the same value as this one, so +/- cash is always possible.
I will look into any tradelist you got, these are just my major wants.
You can send me cash offers tho, would use the money to buy something off my list, but direct trades are always preferred.
HMU
(Located in Germany)
|
|
paolo
Duane loves Gina
Posts: 432
|
Post by paolo on Jan 3, 2017 17:08:38 GMT
Wasn't the Coretex policy one copy per person?
|
|
|
|
Post by iagainsti on Jan 3, 2017 17:11:16 GMT
Unfortunally not!
Seems like a lot of people ordered more then one copy!
I missed it to order one copy as it was sold out after one hour the preorder was up!
Hope to get at least one copy from rev!
|
|
xjoergx
No time for optimism
Posts: 106 
|
Post by xjoergx on Jan 4, 2017 8:04:21 GMT
That was fast. The first one here on the board, only a few hours before it arrives at home 
iagainsti: when those 7ers go online at revhq.com, it will be the same as on coretex. 30 minutes...maximum til they are sold out. |
|
paolo
Duane loves Gina
Posts: 432
|
Post by paolo on Jan 4, 2017 8:28:41 GMT
Well at Least the Rev ones Will go to 100 different people, while apparently there can be few people that ordered from Coretex with multiple copies in theirs hands....
|
|
|
|
Post by iagainsti on Jan 4, 2017 9:03:56 GMT
That was fast. The first one here on the board, only a few hours before it arrives at home
iagainsti: when those 7ers go online at revhq.com, it will be the same as on coretex. 30 minutes...maximum til they are sold out. And i hope they will put them not up during european nightime  |
|
|
|
Post by minoratheart on Jan 4, 2017 21:08:09 GMT
It was sold for 12€, it's been out for a day or two, so it's still a 12€ record, right?
|
|
|
|
Post by iagainsti on Jan 4, 2017 21:26:19 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by reasontorevelate on Jan 4, 2017 22:10:28 GMT
It was sold for 12€, it's been out for a day or two, so it's still a 12€ record, right? Well...it's being talked about, hyped about, flipped about. And now available for only E250,- on discogs. |
|
Adam Tanner
Got a dolla
Practicing Troublemaker
Posts: 128
|
Post by Adam Tanner on Jan 4, 2017 23:29:50 GMT
so how will it be listed on REVHQ when we search for it.. Conne or GB? I've set up a few searches that I look for daily but knowing REV it will be some weird title.
|
|
xjoergx
No time for optimism
Posts: 106
|
Post by xjoergx on Jan 5, 2017 6:54:50 GMT
This is the reason why it was made...hmpf. |
|
takemeaway89
The Sap Hotline
I can still remember the last time I cried.
Posts: 168
|
Post by takemeaway89 on Jan 5, 2017 7:54:46 GMT
Damn flippers. Spoil the game for the real collectors/fans.
|
|
|
|
Post by minoratheart on Jan 5, 2017 8:10:58 GMT
This is the reason why it was made...hmpf. A nice way to make a quick 238 bucks. I really hope no one takes up that offer, because it would set a really bad example. |
|
|
|
Post by iagainsti on Jan 5, 2017 8:15:06 GMT
tbh if he would sell it for maybe 70-80 euros i would think about it to buy.
|
|
|
|
Post by chris2far on Jan 5, 2017 9:16:17 GMT
i guess that was the intention. make as many variations to drive all the collectors crazy.
350 records at least three variants makes the record as rare as a chung king.
if i would press that record, i would keep a handfull to sell later and make some cash or sweet trades. just a tought.
and the other thing that bugs me more...its 2017 now and the first rev release was released in 1987. so it could be that each release might get a 30th Anniversary press.
i hope that it wont end in a huge Anniversary pressing flooding.
|
|
xjoergx
No time for optimism
Posts: 106
|
Post by xjoergx on Jan 5, 2017 11:09:21 GMT
and the other thing that bugs me more...its 2017 now and the first rev release was released in 1987. so it could be that each release might get a 30th Anniversary press. i hope that it wont end in a huge Anniversary pressing flooding. haven´t you heard of that REV 1-3 30th Anniversary Box set in 10 different colors? |
|
xjoergx
No time for optimism
Posts: 106
|
Post by xjoergx on Jan 5, 2017 11:11:21 GMT
if i would press that record, i would keep a handfull to sell later and make some cash or sweet trades. just a tought. this is where the numbers 25-99 are made for haha
|
|
|
|
Post by chris2far on Jan 5, 2017 11:16:51 GMT
and the other thing that bugs me more...its 2017 now and the first rev release was released in 1987. so it could be that each release might get a 30th Anniversary press. i hope that it wont end in a huge Anniversary pressing flooding. haven´t you heard of that REV 1-3 30th Anniversary Box set in 10 different colors? you mean REV 1-30 30th Anniversary in 10 different colors in the next 7 Years? that makes about 300 pressings ;)good Lord, i need some more expedit shelves  |
|
|
|
Post by xneroazzurox on Jan 5, 2017 12:20:09 GMT
i don't know why i am judged here. we're on a record collecting board where rare records are sold and bought for crazy prices all the time.
if someone is selling his chung king he bought a couple of years ago for 1,5k for 6k now, it's totally cool, but just because it's a new records it is wrong.
not my fault that coretex didn't limit the records to one per customer, so taking the chance and buying one for me and two to trade seems totally legit to me (and yes, i consider selling for 200€+ and buying something of my wantlist as a trade).
spoil the game is a totally ridiculous accusation. someone sell me the next release of that kind that i miss for 10$ and i sell the conne press for a tenner as well, no problem with that. but that's not how it works.
think about it
|
|
|
|
Post by deluxxx777 on Jan 5, 2017 12:48:24 GMT
If you know that 1000+ people would buy that record than you press 350 copies Is not cool, anybody here knows how things work nowadays, once the record sold-out...
Personally I don't mind if I pay €12 or €200, I just want to keep the collection complete, so I would appreciate much more a 2000 copies in this case.
Once 350 are gone You can sell your record at your own price !
Who made this record know that as well..
Oh,and the soia conne 7" sold on discogs for 230+\-...I would like to buy one for 50€(With batman stamp) anybody?
Said that the artwork is amazing and the gold vinyl is really cool imo!
|
|
|
|
Post by geoff on Jan 5, 2017 13:59:03 GMT
i don't know why i am judged here. we're on a record collecting board where rare records are sold and bought for crazy prices all the time. if someone is selling his chung king he bought a couple of years ago for 1,5k for 6k now, it's totally cool, but just because it's a new records it is wrong. not my fault that coretex didn't limit the records to one per customer, so taking the chance and buying one for me and two to trade seems totally legit to me (and yes, i consider selling for 200€+ and buying something of my wantlist as a trade). spoil the game is a totally ridiculous accusation. someone sell me the next release of that kind that i miss for 10$ and i sell the conne press for a tenner as well, no problem with that. but that's not how it works. think about it i can tell you why youre being judged.... because what you are doing wrong. you purchased a record with the clear intentions of flipping. thats been frowned on for decades. you had it for less than a day. then you come in here asking for records that a really rare for it in return? now you are complaining that you are being judged? you need a reality check. |
|
|
|
Post by deluxxx777 on Jan 5, 2017 15:02:27 GMT
I'm disagree for 2 reason : first I don't understand the difference between a new and a old record, since I love every single version of a record in the same way. The soia conne 7" is a perfect example because is a "new" record but I haven't seen it pop up often, I offered $100 here but it was considered a low ball offer... Second, if you sell it for $1000 and then you find a buyer and both are happy what's the problem? Collecting is now a business, last together first press on ebay was sold for $320...so if you want this record you must have $320. Someone has instead a record for sale or trade to get $320,again what's the problem? If you don't want to pay 250 for that record, just don't buy it, it's that simple. Core tex is the guilty |
|
|
|
Post by davesfu on Jan 5, 2017 16:01:32 GMT
i don't know why i am judged here. we're on a record collecting board where rare records are sold and bought for crazy prices all the time. if someone is selling his chung king he bought a couple of years ago for 1,5k for 6k now, it's totally cool, but just because it's a new records it is wrong. not my fault that coretex didn't limit the records to one per customer, so taking the chance and buying one for me and two to trade seems totally legit to me (and yes, i consider selling for 200€+ and buying something of my wantlist as a trade). spoil the game is a totally ridiculous accusation. someone sell me the next release of that kind that i miss for 10$ and i sell the conne press for a tenner as well, no problem with that. but that's not how it works. think about it Taking a chance? Seriously? Theres 0% chance, you know exactly what to expect. You waited less than 24 hours and are asking 2500% increase in price on what you paid. That is a straight dickhead move. I could see asking 60-70 bucks to people on this board, most of whom are friends and share the love of the game, and who missed out and would have liked to order it, but asking for that much right after you bought it is a middle finger to everyone on here. FYI everyone - Rev is just waiting for covers to show up before they list them for sale. |
|
|
|
Post by minoratheart on Jan 5, 2017 16:59:28 GMT
I'm disagree for 2 reason : first I don't understand the difference between a new and a old record, since I love every single version of a record in the same way. The soia conne 7" is a perfect example because is a "new" record but I haven't seen it pop up often, I offered $100 here but it was considered a low ball offer... Second, if you sell it for $1000 and then you find a buyer and both are happy what's the problem? Collecting is now a business, last together first press on ebay was sold for $320...so if you want this record you must have $320. Someone has instead a record for sale or trade to get $320,again what's the problem? If you don't want to pay 250 for that record, just don't buy it, it's that simple. Core tex is the guilty The reason people miss out on a record is that another person decided to buy several copies of said record just to flip them for a large amount of money and the people who missed out on the record initially should then be happy about having to pay 10, 15, 20 times of what the original price was? How is that a desirable scenario? I'll gladly give my money to a band and label because they put in all the hard work. Why would I want to throw money at some random person just because they were quicker clicking on 'buy'? Of course, if you pay that amount of money, that's your decision. Supply and demand, yaddayadda, but inflating prices like that - especially on a board where people usually look out for and help each other - feels very wrong to me. |
|
|
|
Post by xneroazzurox on Jan 5, 2017 18:12:38 GMT
I'm disagree for 2 reason : first I don't understand the difference between a new and a old record, since I love every single version of a record in the same way. The soia conne 7" is a perfect example because is a "new" record but I haven't seen it pop up often, I offered $100 here but it was considered a low ball offer... Second, if you sell it for $1000 and then you find a buyer and both are happy what's the problem? Collecting is now a business, last together first press on ebay was sold for $320...so if you want this record you must have $320. Someone has instead a record for sale or trade to get $320,again what's the problem? If you don't want to pay 250 for that record, just don't buy it, it's that simple. Core tex is the guilty The reason people miss out on a record is that another person decided to buy several copies of said record just to flip them for a large amount of money and the people who missed out on the record initially should then be happy about having to pay 10, 15, 20 times of what the original price was? How is that a desirable scenario? I'll gladly give my money to a band and label because they put in all the hard work. Why would I want to throw money at some random person just because they were quicker clicking on 'buy'? Of course, if you pay that amount of money, that's your decision. Supply and demand, yaddayadda, but inflating prices like that - especially on a board where people usually look out for and help each other - feels very wrong to me. so find me someone who is looking out for me selling me a record i missed on for 10$ and i will sell you mine for 10$ as well. sorry, i'm not getting the argument here. it's better we agree to disagree! |
|
